|
:
|
72
|
|
"x" and "Y" are not marked on the photograph:
|
1
|
|
BM print labeled with letters on print designating different areas of excavation. UPM print has no labeling:
|
1
|
|
Buttress in NE wall of E-NUN-MAH:
|
1
|
|
E-nun-mah: room 23:
|
1
|
|
F and E are in this order on the caption.:
|
1
|
|
Five posts, U. 840 corrected in pencil to U. 767, which number is clearly visible on the photograph.:
|
1
|
|
Five pots, U. 654 corrected in pencil to U. 759.:
|
1
|
|
Four inscribed cones:
|
1
|
|
Four pots and two other items. Check against the file-card for PG.10:
|
1
|
|
It is Entemena, not Enannatum.:
|
1
|
|
It is the view same as U. 30 but from a slightly lower angle.:
|
1
|
|
Necklace U. 51:
|
1
|
|
No U. numbers given:
|
1
|
|
Penny notes that th ephoto is cropped in UE IX:
|
1
|
|
Persian date:
|
1
|
|
Photograph of four Arab men; Mitchell in pencil marks the second from the left as Hamoudi.:
|
1
|
|
Plan:
|
1
|
|
Terracottas:
|
1
|
|
This seems to be a duplicate print of negative U.4:
|
1
|
|
Three inscribed cones.:
|
2
|
|
Two inscribed cones:
|
1
|
|
Two inscribed cones.:
|
2
|
|
U 178 on the photograph:
|
1
|
|
U numbers taken from UE IV pl 22b UE IX:
|
1
|
|
U.264 is inscribed; not in UE IV pl 42.:
|
1
|
|
U.646 marked Phil.:
|
1
|
|
UPM print shows two images, one a closeup, the other wider angle with scale. This latter appears to be the image labeled 42 in the BM.:
|
1
|
|
vases of Ur-Engur and Rimush:
|
1
|